Recommendations, affect, and applicant sex when you look at the You

Recommendations, affect, and applicant sex when you look at the You

101 . Newhagen , John E. , “Beyond mind-report: Having fun with latency to resolve design practical question reacting procedure to the web-built public-opinion surveys,” about Sourcebook for Political Telecommunications Search , eds. Bucy , Erik P. and you may Lance Holbert , Roentgen. ( Ny : Routledge , 2011 ).Yahoo College student

102 . Oxley , Douglas R Honduran Еѕene za brak. , Smith , Kevin B. , Alford , John Roentgen. , Hibbing , Matthew V. , Miller , Jennifer L. , Scalora , Mario , Hatemi , Peter K. , and you may Hibbing , John R. , “Political thinking will vary which have physiological qualities,” Technology , 321 : 1667 – 1670 .CrossRefGoogle Student

103 . Swers , Michele L. , “Are feminine likely to vote for ladies’ activities bills than their male acquaintances?” Legislative Training Quarterly 1998 , 23 : 435 – 448 .CrossRefGoogle Scholar

104 . Swers , Michele L. , The real difference Feminine Generate: The policy Perception of females inside Congress ( Chi town : University out of Chi town Push , 2002 ).Yahoo Student

105 . Mountain , Kim Quaile and you may Hurley , Patricia A great. , “Symbolic speeches about U.S. Senate as well as their representational effects,” Record away from Politics 2002 , 64 : 219 – 231 .CrossRefGoogle Scholar

108 . Mansbridge , Jane , “Should blacks show blacks and you will feminine show female? An effective contingent ‘yes’,” Journal regarding Government 1999 , 61 ( step 3 ): 627 – 657 .CrossRefGoogle Pupil

109 . Sanbonmatsu , Kira , “Gender-associated political training and descriptive signal of females,” Governmental Choices 2003 , twenty-five : 367 – 388 .CrossRefGoogle Student

110 . Dolan , Kathleen , “Could there be a beneficial ‘gender attraction effect’ during the Western government? S. Domestic elections,” Governmental Look Every quarter 2008 , 61 : 79 – 89 .CrossRefGoogle Scholar

This post might have been cited because of the after the publications. It number is made based on analysis provided by Crossref.

Benstead, Lindsay J. Jamal, Amaney A. and you will Lust, Ellen 2015. Could it be Gender, Religiosity or Both? A role Congruity Concept away from Candidate Electability when you look at the Transformation Tunisia. Views to the Government, Vol. thirteen, Thing. 1, p. 74.

Bauer, Nichole Meters. 2015. Which stereotypes female applicants? Determining private variations in women label reliance. Politics, Teams, and you may Identities, Vol. 3, Issue. 1, p. 94.

Rosenthal , Cindy Simon , “The newest role out-of gender during the descriptive representation,” Political Research Every quarter 1995 , 48 : 599 – 611

McLaughlin, Bryan Davis, Catasha Coppini, David Kim, Young Mie Knisely, Sandra and McLeod, Douglas 2015. Whenever female attack. Politics as well as the Existence Sciences, Vol. 34, Procedure. 1, p. forty-two.

Pyeatt, Nicholas L. and you will Yanus, Alixandra B. 2016. Giving mixed signals: the fresh new part of gender and partisanship in recommendations out of politicians. Record regarding Elections, Public-opinion and Activities, Vol. 26, Matter. 4, p. 423.

Koch, Thomas and you will Obermaier, Magdalena 2016. Having Cardio and you may (No) Attention? Just how Users Negatively Infer Shed Information regarding Politicians and exactly how Which Affects the Evaluation of your own Speakermunication Search, Vol. 43, Procedure. seven, p. 972.

Turska-Kawa, Agnieszka and you may Olszanecka-. Stereotypes Choosing Perceptions regarding Feminine People in politics: The scenario of Poland. Politics in Central European countries, Vol. fourteen, Topic. step three, p. 7.

Schneider, Monica C. and Bos, Angela L. 2019. The effective use of Public Role Idea into the Examination of Gender within the Government. Political Mindset, Vol. forty, Point. S1, p. 173.

Park, Sun More youthful and you may Baek, More youthful Min 2019. Citizens’ Ambivalence towards Feminine People in politics: As to why Ambivalence Matters to own Gender Equality when you look at the a great Democracy. Journal of women, Politics & Coverage, Vol. forty, Issue. dos, p. 309.

Rusidze, Nino 2019. Stereotypes, Reputation Murder and Women in Politics. Corvinus Log away from In the world Points, Vol. cuatro, Topic. step one, p. fifteen.

Aaldering, Loes and you may Van Der Jamais, Daphne Joanna 2020. Political Leaders on the Mass media: Gender Prejudice from inside the Chief Stereotypes through the Strategy and you may Routine Minutes. Uk Log out of Political Research, Vol. fifty, Material. 3, p. 911.

Boer, Noortje 2020. How do Owners Evaluate Roadway?Level Bureaucrats’ Passion and you can Skills? An effective Typology and you will Decide to try. Social Government Opinion, Vol. 80, Procedure. cuatro, p. 532.

Deixe um comentário

O seu endereço de e-mail não será publicado. Campos obrigatórios são marcados com *

Warning: Undefined array key "user-agent" in /home/storage/0/6f/03/omnidf1/public_html/wp-includes/class-wp-http-curl.php on line 140

Warning: Undefined array key "stream" in /home/storage/0/6f/03/omnidf1/public_html/wp-includes/class-wp-http-curl.php on line 183